Comments on: Richard Dawkins Interviews The Bishop Of Oxford http://radicalfilms.co.uk/2007/11/11/richard-dawkins-interviews-the-bishop-of-oxford/ Fri, 27 Apr 2012 12:46:44 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3 By: Ed http://radicalfilms.co.uk/2007/11/11/richard-dawkins-interviews-the-bishop-of-oxford/comment-page-1/#comment-113 Ed Sat, 31 May 2008 12:09:23 +0000 http://radicalfilms.wordpress.com/2007/11/11/richard-dawkins-interviews-the-bishop-of-oxford/#comment-113 To be fair to Mr. Dawkins, he did apparently protest the title of the documentary to Channel 4. They would not relent, however. The only concession he did manage was the addition of the question mark. I stand by my opinion that to assert (more so in the title than even the content of the film) that religion is 'the root of all evil' is dangerous and irresponsible. This, it would appear, is the fault of the Channel 4 production team. However, if I was Dawkins I would have refused to put my name to it if the title wasn't changed. Just my opinion. Knowledge is power and with power comes responsibility. The media is a disturbing lense as it is without Oxford Deans of Evolutionary Biology failing to exercise their alleged intellects and influence by preventing such spectacular pop-distortion of such grossly, disproportionately powerful subliminal suggestion. To be fair to Mr. Dawkins, he did apparently protest the title of the documentary to Channel 4. They would not relent, however. The only concession he did manage was the addition of the question mark.

I stand by my opinion that to assert (more so in the title than even the content of the film) that religion is ‘the root of all evil’ is dangerous and irresponsible. This, it would appear, is the fault of the Channel 4 production team. However, if I was Dawkins I would have refused to put my name to it if the title wasn’t changed. Just my opinion.

Knowledge is power and with power comes responsibility. The media is a disturbing lense as it is without Oxford Deans of Evolutionary Biology failing to exercise their alleged intellects and influence by preventing such spectacular pop-distortion of such grossly, disproportionately powerful subliminal suggestion.

]]> By: Ed http://radicalfilms.co.uk/2007/11/11/richard-dawkins-interviews-the-bishop-of-oxford/comment-page-1/#comment-708 Ed Sat, 31 May 2008 12:09:23 +0000 http://radicalfilms.wordpress.com/2007/11/11/richard-dawkins-interviews-the-bishop-of-oxford/#comment-708 To be fair to Mr. Dawkins, he did apparently protest the title of the documentary to Channel 4. They would not relent, however. The only concession he did manage was the addition of the question mark. I stand by my opinion that to assert (more so in the title than even the content of the film) that religion is 'the root of all evil' is dangerous and irresponsible. This, it would appear, is the fault of the Channel 4 production team. However, if I was Dawkins I would have refused to put my name to it if the title wasn't changed. Just my opinion. Knowledge is power and with power comes responsibility. The media is a disturbing lense as it is without Oxford Deans of Evolutionary Biology failing to exercise their alleged intellects and influence by preventing such spectacular pop-distortion of such grossly, disproportionately powerful subliminal suggestion. To be fair to Mr. Dawkins, he did apparently protest the title of the documentary to Channel 4. They would not relent, however. The only concession he did manage was the addition of the question mark.

I stand by my opinion that to assert (more so in the title than even the content of the film) that religion is ‘the root of all evil’ is dangerous and irresponsible. This, it would appear, is the fault of the Channel 4 production team. However, if I was Dawkins I would have refused to put my name to it if the title wasn’t changed. Just my opinion.

Knowledge is power and with power comes responsibility. The media is a disturbing lense as it is without Oxford Deans of Evolutionary Biology failing to exercise their alleged intellects and influence by preventing such spectacular pop-distortion of such grossly, disproportionately powerful subliminal suggestion.

]]> By: Grayson http://radicalfilms.co.uk/2007/11/11/richard-dawkins-interviews-the-bishop-of-oxford/comment-page-1/#comment-112 Grayson Sat, 31 May 2008 11:45:05 +0000 http://radicalfilms.wordpress.com/2007/11/11/richard-dawkins-interviews-the-bishop-of-oxford/#comment-112 Dawkins is obviously not ignorant to the fact that evil exists outside of religion and he doesn't argue that it doesn't. He argues that it (religion) is dangerous and harmful to the world, not that all evil is due to religion. Did you even watch the actual documentary? It sure sounds like you haven't.... Dawkins is obviously not ignorant to the fact that evil exists outside of religion and he doesn’t argue that it doesn’t. He argues that it (religion) is dangerous and harmful to the world, not that all evil is due to religion. Did you even watch the actual documentary? It sure sounds like you haven’t….

]]> By: Grayson http://radicalfilms.co.uk/2007/11/11/richard-dawkins-interviews-the-bishop-of-oxford/comment-page-1/#comment-707 Grayson Sat, 31 May 2008 11:45:05 +0000 http://radicalfilms.wordpress.com/2007/11/11/richard-dawkins-interviews-the-bishop-of-oxford/#comment-707 Dawkins is obviously not ignorant to the fact that evil exists outside of religion and he doesn't argue that it doesn't. He argues that it (religion) is dangerous and harmful to the world, not that all evil is due to religion. Did you even watch the actual documentary? It sure sounds like you haven't.... Dawkins is obviously not ignorant to the fact that evil exists outside of religion and he doesn’t argue that it doesn’t. He argues that it (religion) is dangerous and harmful to the world, not that all evil is due to religion. Did you even watch the actual documentary? It sure sounds like you haven’t….

]]> By: Ed http://radicalfilms.co.uk/2007/11/11/richard-dawkins-interviews-the-bishop-of-oxford/comment-page-1/#comment-111 Ed Mon, 12 Nov 2007 19:21:47 +0000 http://radicalfilms.wordpress.com/2007/11/11/richard-dawkins-interviews-the-bishop-of-oxford/#comment-111 lol! lol!

]]> By: Ed http://radicalfilms.co.uk/2007/11/11/richard-dawkins-interviews-the-bishop-of-oxford/comment-page-1/#comment-706 Ed Mon, 12 Nov 2007 19:21:47 +0000 http://radicalfilms.wordpress.com/2007/11/11/richard-dawkins-interviews-the-bishop-of-oxford/#comment-706 lol! lol!

]]> By: Peter http://radicalfilms.co.uk/2007/11/11/richard-dawkins-interviews-the-bishop-of-oxford/comment-page-1/#comment-110 Peter Mon, 12 Nov 2007 06:17:48 +0000 http://radicalfilms.wordpress.com/2007/11/11/richard-dawkins-interviews-the-bishop-of-oxford/#comment-110 Not a fan of Dawkins? I think you are simply ignorant to his material all he says is fact and all correct. Not a fan of Dawkins? I think you are simply ignorant to his material all he says is fact and all correct.

]]> By: Peter http://radicalfilms.co.uk/2007/11/11/richard-dawkins-interviews-the-bishop-of-oxford/comment-page-1/#comment-705 Peter Mon, 12 Nov 2007 06:17:48 +0000 http://radicalfilms.wordpress.com/2007/11/11/richard-dawkins-interviews-the-bishop-of-oxford/#comment-705 Not a fan of Dawkins? I think you are simply ignorant to his material all he says is fact and all correct. Not a fan of Dawkins? I think you are simply ignorant to his material all he says is fact and all correct.

]]>