I’m not sure this is an adequate or fair representation across the board. However, it does reflect my experience here in the UK. Whenever I spoke to people about the US nominee’s, they knew little or nothing about them. Having personally read a fair amount about Mr. Obama, his policies, the people he associates with politically (even socially), and having watched some aspects of his campaign with scrutiny, I had a very different view of him than my – apparently – less informed peers. The difference between myself and them was this: our faith in the man and what he represented was inversely proportionate to the amount of knowledge we had about him, his campaign, or his policies. I find this terrifying.

“Is Barack Obama a brilliant orator, captivating millions through his eloquence? Or is he deliberately using the techniques of neurolinguistic programming (NLP), a covert form of hypnosis developed by Milton Erickson, M.D.?

A fundamental tool of “conversational hypnosis” is pacing and leading – a way for the hypnotist to bypass the listeners critical faculty by associating repeated statements that are unquestionably accurate with the message he wants to convey.
In his Denver acceptance speech, Obama used the phrases “thats why I stand here tonight,” “now is the time,” and “this moment” 14 times. Paces are connected to the lead by words such as “and,” “as,” “because,” or “that is why.” For example, “we need change” (who could disagree?)”and that is why I will be your next President.”

Techniques of trance induction include extra slow speech, rhythm, tonalities, vagueness, visual imagery, metaphor, and raising of emotion. Hypnotists often have patients count. In a speech after the primaries closed, Obama said: “Sixteen months have passed (paused) “Thousands” (pause) “of miles” (pause) “Millions of voices”.

Hypnotists call this a distraction technique: sending the dominant hemisphere on an assignment involving linguistic processes, thus opening the nondominant hemisphere to suggestion.”

Consider Hitler, Bush’s war on terror. The masses are more easily swayed with non-sequitirs than you’d imagine. While I find the inference of this short video a little kooky, the message – I feel – is strong and needs to be seriously considered by all. It is a simple fact that these methods are employed: ask any PR/oratory expert. Try asking Barack…

Larry Sinclair accepts $10,000 polygraph test       Suspicious polygraph test results by a fake polygrapher, Sinclair declares he will sue
From the er, horses mouth. I thought long and hard about posting this. I’ve no idea whether this allegation is true or not. But Barack Obama supports pre-emptive nuclear strikes on Pakistan, and he signed the Patriot Act, and so even if it isn’t I hope this buries him along with that other corporate whore, Clinton. Ron Paul for President.